Of Strathmore and Cintiqs
I swore I wouldn’t put anything in this blog until Errant Heart is officially unveiled. But, I’ve happened across something that I think would make for good blogging fodder so before I forget…
First, you need to know a little about me. I’m an inker and toner. It’s what I’ve been doing, almost exclusively, for years in my quasi-professional artistic career. I probably have somewhere around 800-or-so inked pages under my belt. As such, I’ve used a variety of tools, like Microns, dip pens and tablets. And I’ve used a variety of different paper – card stock, bristol, papers of varying weights, etc. Some artists say that paper doesn’t matter – inking on a cocktail napkin is sufficient. Well, yes, perhaps it is after a certain number of Martinis. But I can tell the difference in papers. Heck, I can spot the difference in different batches of the same brand of paper. As such, I’m pretty finicky about what I use.
Enter the Cintiq.
For years, I’ve lusted after the Wacom Cintiq. It seemed like a wonderful tool – drawing directly on your monitor?! Sign me up! However, I started having misgivings about the concept after getting my first Graphire. Oh don’t get me wrong – I found it useful. But only for a few, very specific tasks related to digital toning techniques. When it came to working digitally, the mouse was good enough for me.
But, as luck would have it, I eventually stumbled onto a good deal on a used Cintiq. I hesitated, but eventually caved and got one. I don’t mind saying that I was pretty intimidated by the thing. Even used, it costs a small fortune. And it was awfully overwhelming in stature as it sat on my desk – mocking me, daring me to use it.
Oh sure, as a monitor it’s very good. But I needed to start using the thing as it was intended, lest I feel like an idiot for dropping so much cash on a tool that I would never use. Recalling the awkwardness of the Graphire, I reluctantly tested the Cintiq out. Kicked the tires, if you will. Not bad. Not bad…
And then, like a sweaty fat kid on a hot day who hems and haws about jumping into a cold swimming pool after dipping his toe in, I was suddenly pushed into the deep end. And wouldn’t you know it? I could swim!
All my fears about awkwardness, or lack of “texture” on the surface of the Cintiq, or worries about my lines turning out shaky, or inability to make long, smooth, flowy lines evaporated. After just one intense session with the thing, I can honestly say I never, EVER want to touch the mouse for even the smallest of graphical functions again. It’s like trying to draw with a potato. Yeah, it can be done. But why?
Furthermore – with the Cintiq I find that I have far more control over my lines. That’s not to say that it’s necessarily better than using physical inking techniques. Rather, by going all-digital, any “signal degradation” that crops up in the process of physically inking something disappears.
Normally, my process would involve printing out pencils (usually on two separate pieces of 8.5×11 and taped together) and affixing it to some 400 series Strathmore. Then I’d put it on the lightbox and ink it. After that, I’d scan it in and clean it up. As you might be able to tell, there’s a lot of setup work. And errors are introduced at every step – the printouts aren’t perfect. The printouts get obscured by the Strathmore (so I can’t see all the fine details). The scanner doesn’t pick up every detail. But with the Cintiq? No such problems exist.
So in the end, if you’re a sweaty little fat kid, worried about diving into a cold pool – just do it.
0 comments